Select Page

Colorado’s job losses weren’t as terrible as previously thought. With newer data, the state Department of Labor and Employment on Monday said it revised December’s unemployment rate to 6.9%, which sounds a lot better than the 8.4% announced earlier.

Ryan Gedney, the labor department’s senior economist, said the change is due to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ annual process to check newly available data. In this case, a key contributor was the Census Bureau revising population data. 

“It just means that at that point, our estimate was too high,” Gedney said. “If you break it down, our labor force estimate was too high. Our employment estimate was too low.”

Colorado Department of Labor and Employment revised the state’s 2020 unemployment rates after the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics introduced a new process. The state’s high of 12.2% in April dropped to 12.1%. But the biggest change was in December, with the unemployment rate falling to 6.9% instead of the previously reported 8.4%. (Handout)

Colorado’s labor force was larger in December than previously reported, though it was still down 112,873 jobs from January 2020.  After the revision, not as many people were unemployed, either. Approximately 219,269 remained unemployed in December, or 49,910 fewer than previously reported.

But 2020 was a highly volatile year because of the coronavirus pandemic, with the bulk of job losses blamed on capacity and health restrictions on businesses enacted by local and state governments. As it turns out, the unemployment rate for almost every month last year in Colorado was moved up or down, including April, which was the state’s highest ever. April was revised down to 12.1%, from 12.2%. The December rate had the largest revision of 1.5%.

“It was quite a revision,” said Brian Lewandowski, executive director of the Business Research Division at University of Colorado Boulder’s Leeds School of Business. “The initial December unemployment rate seemed like an anomaly — it was a strange spike from October and November. The revised number for December seems much more plausible.”

The changes mean the unemployment rate in Colorado was steady at 6.9% in October, November and December, despite new restrictions in mid-November that limited indoor dining due to a spike in COVID-19 cases. 

The Thirsty Monk on E. 17th Ave. posts an availability sign in its front window. Their website reads, “Due to the impact surrounding COVID-19, Thirsty Monk Denver has closed. Thanks so much for a great few years! Cheers!” Signs of COVID-19 and its effects on bars and restaurants are visible around the metro area on December 16, 2020 in Denver, Colorado. (Kathryn Scott, The Colorado Sun)

Restaurants felt the pain of the closures, though, and still have not recovered, Sonia Riggs, president of the Colorado Restaurant Association, said during a news conference last week. A survey of 279 restaurant operators, conducted Jan. 15-30, concluded that 40% of the industry’s employees had been laid off or furloughed during COVID-19.

“Based on staffing levels, we estimate the restaurant industry shed nearly 94,000 jobs year over year,” Riggs said. “In addition, 90% of restaurants we surveyed say sales are down since 2019. If nothing changes, 50% of restaurants surveyed are telling us they will have to consider closing permanently within six months.”

MORE: Colorado unemployment claims are sharply rising again with restaurants seeing largest share of job cuts

December’s initially higher unemployment rate put Colorado above the national rate at the time, 6.7%, and earned the unwelcome distinction as fourth-highest in the U.S.. 

Since all states had to revise their data, about 20 others saw vast differences in their past unemployment rates, too. Now, Colorado’s numbers don’t look as terrible — at least relative to other states.

“What that’s really saying is the spike in unemployment really wasn’t there for what we initially estimated,” Gedney said. “What this changes is we said Colorado’s unemployment was 8.4% (in December) and ranked 47th. Really, it’s 6.9% (but) Colorado still ranks in the bottom third at 36. So the situation improved slightly, but the story we’re looking at is our recovery is really similar to the U.S. We’re not an outlier.”

And from an annual perspective, Colorado’s 7.3% unemployment rate for 2020 now ranks 25th, or “smack in the middle,” Gedney said, which puts Colorado in a better spot nationwide compared to where it was during the Great Recession and the dot-com bust.

Colorado’s unemployment rate fell to 6.6% in January as the state added more jobs and people went back to work. Thirty-five other states had lower unemployment rates, including Utah, which tied with South Dakota for the nation’s lowest rate at 3.1%. The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 6.3% in January.

January’s non-farm labor force is still down about 135,900 jobs from a year ago. The leisure and hospitality industry remains the hardest hit and accounts for nearly two-thirds of the jobs still lost. 

Around the state, the counties with the highest unemployment rates for January were Huerfano, at 9.8%; Pueblo, at 9.3%; Gilpin, at 8.1%; Fremont, at 8.1%; Las Animas, at 7.9%; and Mesa, at 7.9%. County-level unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted and are directly comparable to Colorado’s January unadjusted rate of 6.9%.

Some industries are back to normal. According to state data, four industries have regained all the jobs lost in the past year. Those were financial/insurance, transportation/warehousing, management of companies and the retail trade.

“It’s kind of a bifurcated recovery here with retail,” Gedney said. “Where we’re really seeing the gains in retail are pandemic related. We’re seeing a lot of grocery stores, some food and beverage, general warehousing — so think about your large supermarkets, a lot of home repair stores, big box stores. Where we’re not seeing much recovery is in clothing stores. Places like that are still lagging in the recovery.”  

MORE: Online sales boom poses challenges for Colorado tax forecasting — and for brick-and-mortar retailers

This content was originally published here.